|
The effect of
pulsed electromagnetic fields on hindfoot arthrodesis: a prospective study. Departent of Orthopaedic Surgery, Interfaith Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY 11213, USA. The aim
of this study was to evaluate the effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields in a consecutive series of 64 patients undergoing
hindfoot arthrodesis (144 joints). All patients who underwent elective triple/subtalar arthrodesis were randomized into control
and pulsed electromagnetic field study groups. Subjects in the study group had an external pulsed electromagnetic fields device
applied over the cast for 12 hours a day. Radiographs were taken pre- and postoperatively until radiographic union occurred.
A senior musculoskeletal radiologist, blinded to the treatment scheme, evaluated the radiographic parameters. The average
time to radiographic union in the control group was 14.5 weeks in 33 primary subtalar arthrodeses. There were 4 nonunions.
The study group consisted of 22 primary subtalar arthrodeses and 5 revisions. The average time to radiographic union was 12.9
weeks (P =.136). The average time to fusion of the talonavicular joint in the control group was 17.6 weeks in 19 primary procedures.
In the pulsed electromagnetic fields group of 20 primary and 3 revision talonavicular arthrodeses, the average time to radiographic
fusion was 12.2 weeks (P =.003). For the 21 calcaneocuboid arthrodeses in control group, the average time to radiographic
fusion was 17.7 weeks; it was 13.1 weeks (P =.010) for the 19 fusions in the study group. This study suggests that, if all
parameters are equal, the adjunctive use of a pulsed electromagnetic field in elective hindfoot arthrodesis may increase the
rate and speed of radiographic union of these joints. hort-term
pain relief
Centre de recherche rhumatologique et thermal, BP 234, 73100 Aix-Les-Bains cedex, France. We report the results of a cost-effectiveness evaluation of pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy and
spa therapy (ST) versus usual care (control) for chronic neck pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Inclusion criteria were age 18
to 80 years with pain in the neck area of more than 3 months' duration and no contraindications for PEMF therapy and ST. Randomization
to the ST (n=25) and PEMF groups (n=26) was blinded, as was collection of data. Non-included subjects (n=29) underwent usual
care. The trial respected the Helsinki declaration, and informed consent was obtained from subjects. The analysis was intent
to treat; the main outcome measure was increase in health dimension scores on the MOS SF-36 in terms of increase in French
health care costs from 6 months preceding to 6 months after the start of the study. RESULTS: The increase in health care costs
was less for the PEMF group (+68euro+/-539 [95% confidence interval (CI)]: -145.0+281) than the ST and control groups. The
increase tended to be less, but not significantly, for the ST group (+373+/-938 euro [95% CI, -14.0+76.0]) than for controls
(+618+/-2715 euro [95% CI, -434.0+167.0]). The gain of one physical MOS SF-36 unit during one year cost 3400 euro [95% CI,
-6759+13 100] for the PEMF group, 29,000 euro [95% CI, -1093+59 375] for the ST group and 95076 euro [95% CI, -66 769+256
923] for the control group, but the differences were not significant. COMMENTARY: These results suggest a potential cost-effectiveness
for ST and particularly PEMF as compared to usual care in chronic cervical pain. Our results perhaps lack significance probably
because of lack of statistical power and do not distinguish costs related or not to chronic cervical pain.
Rheumatol Int. 2006 Feb;26(4):320-4. Epub 2005 Jun 29. The effect of pulsed electromagnetic
fields in the treatment of cervical osteoarthritis: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial.Ankara Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Education and Research Hospital, Turk
ocagi S No: 3 Sihhiye, Ankara, Turkey. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of electromagnetic
field therapy (PEMF) on pain, range of motion (ROM) and functional status in patients with cervical osteoarthritis (COA).
Thirty-four patients with COA were included in a randomized, double-blind study. PEMF was administrated to the whole body
using a mat 1.8 x 0.6 m in size. During the treatment, the patients lay on the mat for 30 min per session, twice a day for
3 weeks. Pain levels in the PEMF group decreased significantly after therapy (p<0.001), but no change was observed in the
placebo group. The active ROM, paravertebral muscle spasm and neck pain and disability scale (NPDS) scores improved significantly
after PEMF therapy (p<0.001) but no change was observed in the sham group. The results of this study are promising, in
that PEMF t
: Mt Sinai J Med. 2006 Jul;73(4):716-8. LinksPulsed radiofrequency for the treatment of ilioinguinal neuralgia
after inguinal herniorrhaphy.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Box 1010, Mount Sinai Medical Center, One
East 100th Street, New York, NY 10029-6574, USA. dimarozen@hotmail.com BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Ilioinguinal
neuralgia secondary to inguinal hernia repair is frequently a chronic, debilitating pain. It is most often due to destruction
or entrapment of nerve tissue from staples, sutures, or direct surgical trauma. Treatment modalities, including oral analgesics,
nerve blocks, mesh excision, and surgical neurectomy, have varied success rates. Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) has recently
been described as a successful method of treating chronic groin pain. Unlike conventional radiofrequency, PRF is non-neurodestructive
and therefore less painful and without the potential complications of neuritis-like reactions and neuroma formation. Although
the mechanism is unknown, it appears that the interaction of an electromagnetic field and c-fos proteins may alter normal
transmission of painful impulses. Our study examines five patients treated with PRF for ilioinguinal neuralgia secondary to
inguinal herniorrhaphy. METHOD: Five patients were diagnosed with chronic ilioinguinal neuralgia secondary to inguinal hernia
repair at our institution. Each patient was treated at vertebral T12, L1, and L2 with root PRF at 42 degrees C for 120 seconds
per level. RESULTS: Four out of five patients reported pain relief lasting from four to nine months on follow-up visits. Only
one patient reported no pain relief whatsoever. CONCLUSION: Ilioinguinal neuralgia is challenging to treat. We have demonstrated
the successful use of PRF for four out of five patients seen in our office.
J Rheumatol. 1993 Mar;20(3):456-60. Links- Comment in:
- J Rheumatol. 1993 Dec;20(12):2166-7.
A double-blind trial of the clinical effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields in osteoarthritisDepartment
of Medicine (Rheumatology), Danbury Hospital, CT 06810. OBJECTIVE. Further evaluation of pulsed electromagnetic
fields (PEMF), which have been observed to produce numerous biological effects, and have been used to treat delayed union
fractures for over a decade. METHODS. In a pilot, double-blind randomized trial, 27 patients with osteoarthritis (OA), primarily
of the knee, were treated with PEMF. Treatment consisted of 18 half-hour periods of exposure over about 1 month in a specially
designed noncontact, air-coil device. Observations were made on 6 clinical variables at baseline, midpoint of therapy, end
of treatment and one month later; 25 patients completed treatment. RESULTS. An average improvement of 23-61% occurred in the
clinical variables observed with active treatment, while 2 to 18% improvement was observed in these variables in placebo treated
control patients. No toxicity was observed. CONCLUSION. The decreased pain and improved functional performance of treated
patients suggests that this configuration of PEMF has potential as an effective method of improving symptoms in patients with
OA. This method warrants further clinical investigation. PMID: 8478852 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE
Multiple sclerosis Effects of a pulsed electromagnetic therapy on multiple sclerosis
fatigue and quality of life: a double-blind, placebo controlled trial.
Energy Medicine
Developments, (North America), Inc., Burke, Va., USA.
CONTEXT:
There is a growing literature on the biological and clinical effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields. Some studies suggest
that electromagnetic therapies may be useful in the treatment of chronic illnesses. This study is a follow-up to a placebo
controlled pilot study in which multiple sclerosis (MS) patients exposed to weak, extremely low frequency pulsed electromagnetic
fields showed significant improvements on a composite symptom measure. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of a pulsed electromagnetic
therapy on MS related fatigue, spasticity, bladder control, and overall quality of life. DESIGN: A multi-site, double-blind,
placebo controlled, crossover trial. Each subject received 4 weeks of the active and placebo treatments separated by a 2-week
washout period. SETTING: The University of Washington Medical Center in Seattle Wash, the Neurology Center of Fairfax inFairfax, Va,
and the headquarters of the Multiple Sclerosis Association of America in Cherry Hill, NJ. SUBJECTS: 117 patients with clinically definite MS. INTERVENTION: Daily exposure to
a small, portable pulsing electromagnetic field generator. MAIN OUTCOME: The MS Quality of Life Inventory (MSQLI) was used
to assess changes in fatigue, bladder control, spasticity, and a quality of life composite. RESULTS: Paired t-tests were used
to assess treatment differences in the 117 subjects (81% of the initial sample) who completed both treatment sessions. Improvements
in fatigue and overall quality of life were significantly greater on the active device. There were no treatment effects for
bladder control and a disability composite, and mixed results for spasticity. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence from this randomized,
double-bind, placebo controlled trial is consistent with results from smaller studies suggesting that exposure to pulsing,
weak electromagnetic fields can alleviate symptoms of MS. The clinical effects were small, however, and need to be replicated.
Additional research is also needed to examine the possibility that ambulatory patients and patients taking interferons for
their MS may be most responsive to this kind of treatment.
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2002 Nov 30;114(21-22):953; author reply 953.Pulsed magnetic field therapy for osteoarthritis of the knee--a double-blind sham-controlled trial.Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, AKH Wien, University of Vienna, Vienna,
Austria. Peter.nicolakis@akh-wien.ac.at BACKGROUND AND METHODS: Pulsed magnetic field therapy is frequently
used to treat the symptoms of osteoarthritis, although its efficacy has not been proven. We conducted a randomized, double-blind
comparison of pulsed magnetic field and sham therapy in patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee. Patients were
assigned to receive 84 sessions, each with a duration of 30 minutes, of either pulsed magnetic field or sham treatment. Patients
administered the treatment on their own at home, twice a day for six weeks. RESULTS: According to a sample size estimation,
36 consecutive patients were enrolled. 34 patients completed the study, two of whom had to be excluded from the statistical
analysis, as they had not applied the PMF sufficiently. Thus, 15 verum and 17 sham-treated patients were enrolled in the statistical
analysis. After six weeks of treatment the WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index was reduced in the pulsed magnetic field-group from
84.1 (+/- 45.1) to 49.7 (+/- 31.6), and from 73.7 (+/- 43.3) to 66.9 (+/- 52.9) in the sham-treated group (p = 0.03). The
following secondary parameters improved in the pulsed magnetic field group more than they did in the sham group: gait speed
at fast walking [+6.0 meters per minute (1.6 to 10.4) vs. -3.2 (-8.5 to 2.2)], stride length at fast walking [+6.9 cm (0.2
to 13.7) vs. -2.9 (-8.8 to 2.9)], and acceleration time in the isokinetic dynamometry strength tests [-7.0% (-15.2 to 1.3)
vs. 10.1% (-0.3 to 20.6)]. CONCLUSION: In patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee, PMF treatment can reduce impairment
in activities of daily life and improve knee function. PMID: 12602111 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Clin Rheumatol. 2007 Jan;26(1):69-74. Epub 2006 Apr 22. LinksEffectiveness of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in lateral
epicondylitis.Trakya University Medical Faculty Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Edirne,
Turkey, druzunca@yahoo.com. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF)
in lateral epicondylitis comparing the modality with sham PEMF and local steroid injection. Sixty patients with lateral epicondylitis
were randomly and equally distributed into three groups as follows: Group I received PEMF, Group II sham PEMF, and Group III
a corticosteroid + anesthetic agent injection. Pain levels during rest, activity, nighttime, resisted wrist dorsiflexion,
and forearm supination were investigated with visual analog scale (VAS). Pain threshold on elbow was determined with algometer.
All patients were evaluated before treatment at the third week and the third month. VAS values during activity and pain levels
during resisted wrist dorsiflexion were significantly lower in Group III than Group I at the third week. Group I patients
had lower pain during rest, activity and nighttime than Group III at third month. PEMF seems to reduce lateral epicondylitis
pain better than sham PEMF. Corticosteroid and anesthetic agent injections can be used in patients for rapid return to activities.
J Int Med Res. 2006 Mar-Apr;34(2):160-7. LinksEfficacy of pulsed electromagnetic therapy for chronic lower
back pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine,
Seoul, Korea. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial studied the effectiveness
of pulsed electromagnetic therapy (PEMT) in patients with chronic lower back pain. Active PEMT (n = 17) or placebo treatment
(n = 19) was performed three times a week for 3 weeks. Patients were assessed using a numerical rating scale (NRS) and revised
Oswestry disability scores for 4 weeks after therapy. PEMT produced significant pain reduction throughout the observation
period compared with baseline values. The percentage change in the NRS score from baseline was significantly greater in the
PEMT group than the placebo group at all three time-points measured. The mean revised Oswestry disability percentage after
4 weeks was significantly improved from the baseline value in the PEMT group, whereas there were no significant differences
in the placebo group. In conclusion, PEMT reduced pain and disability and appears to be a potentially useful therapeutic tool
for the conservative management of chronic lower back pain.
Outcomes after posterolateral lumbar fusion with instrumentation in patients treated with adjunctive
pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation.
Bose B.
Medical Center of Delaware, Newark, USA.
Fusion success and clinical outcome were determined in 48 high-risk
patients who underwent posterolateral lumbar fusions with internal fixation and were treated with adjunctive pulsed electromagnetic
field (PEMF) stimulation postoperatively. An independent radiographic assessment demonstrated a success rate of 97.9%. Following
treatment, 59% of the working patients returned to their employment. Overall clinical assessment was excellent in 4.2% of
patients, good in 79.2%, and fair in 16.7%; no patient had a poor clinical assessment.
J Rehabil Med. 2005 Nov;37(6):372-7. LinksIce and pulsed electromagnetic field to reduce pain and swelling
after distal radius fractures.Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon,
Hong Kong. rsgladys@polyu.edu.hk OBJECTIVE: To examine the relative effectiveness of ice therapy and/or
pulsed electromagnetic field in reducing pain and swelling after the immobilization period following a distal radius fracture.
METHODS: A total of 83 subjects were randomly allocated to receive 30 minutes of either ice plus pulsed electromagnetic field
(group A); ice plus sham pulsed electromagnetic field (group B); pulsed electromagnetic field alone (group C), or sham pulsed
electromagnetic field treatment for 5 consecutive days (group D). All subjects received a standard home exercise programme.
A visual analogue scale was used for recording pain; volumetric displacement for measuring the swelling of the forearm; and
a hand-held goniometer for measuring the range of wrist motions before treatment on days 1, 3 and 5. RESULTS: At day 5, a
significantly greater cumulative reduction in the visual analogue scores as well as ulnar deviation range of motion was found
in group A than the other 3 groups. For volumetric measurement and pronation, participants in group A performed better than
subjects in group D but not those in group B. CONCLUSION: The addition of pulsed electromagnetic field to ice therapy produces
better overall treatment outcomes than ice alone, or pulsed electromagnetic field alone in pain reduction and range of joint
motion in ulnar deviation and flexion for a distal radius fracture after an immobilization period of 6 weeks.
Pulsed magnetic field therapy in refractory neuropathic
pain secondary to peripheral neuropathy: electrodiagnostic parameters--pilot study.New York Medical College, Briarcliff Manor, New York 10510, USA. CONTEXT:
Neuropathic pain (NP) from peripheral neuropathy (PN) arises from ectopic firing of unmyelinated C-fibers with accumulation
of sodium and calcium channels. Because pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) safely induce extremely low frequency (ELF) quasirectangular
currents that can depolarize, repolarize, and hyperpolarize neurons, it was hypothesized that directing this energy into the
sole of one foot could potentially modulate neuropathic pain. OBJECTIVE: To determine if 9 consecutive 1-h treatments in physician's
office (excluding weekends) of a pulsed signal therapy can reduce NP scores in refractory feet with PN. DESIGN/SETTING/PATIENTS:
24 consecutive patients with refractory and symptomatic PN from diabetes, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy
(CIDP), pernicious anemia, mercury poisoning, paraneoplastic syndrome, tarsal tunnel, and idiopathic sensory neuropathy were
enrolled in this nonplacebo pilot study. The most symptomatic foot received therapy. Primary endpoints were comparison of
VAS scores at the end of 9 days and the end of 30 days follow-up compared to baseline pain scores. Additionally, Patients'
Global Impression of Change (PGIC) questionnaire was tabulated describing response to treatment. Subgroup analysis of nerve
conduction scores, quantified sensory testing (QST), and serial examination changes were also tabulated. Subgroup classification
of pain (Serlin) was utilized to determine if there were disproportionate responses. INTERVENTION: Noninvasive pulsed signal
therapy generates a unidirectional quasirectangular waveform with strength about 20 gauss and a frequency about 30 Hz into
the soles of the feet for 9 consecutive 1-h treatments (excluding weekends). The most symptomatic foot of each patient was
treated. RESULTS: All 24 feet completed 9 days of treatment. 15/24 completed follow-up (62%) with mean pain scores decreasing
21% from baseline to end of treatment (P=0.19) but with 49% reduction of pain scores from baseline to end of follow-up (P<0.01).
Of this group, self-reported PGIC was improved 67% (n=10) and no change was 33% (n=5). An intent-to-treat analysis based on
all 24 feet demonstrated a 19% reduction in pain scores from baseline to end of treatment (P=0.10) and a 37% decrease from
baseline to end of follow-up (P<0.01). Subgroup analysis revealed 5 patients with mild pain with nonsignificant reduction
at end of follow-up. Of the 19 feet with moderate to severe pain, there was a 28% reduction from baseline to end of treatment
(P<0.05) and a 39% decrease from baseline to end of follow-up (P<0.01). Benefit was better in those patients with axonal
changes and advanced CPT baseline scores. The clinical examination did not change. There were no adverse events or safety
issues. CONCLUSIONS: These pilot data demonstrate that directing PEMF to refractory feet can provide unexpected shortterm
analgesic effects in more than 50% of individuals. The role of placebo is not known and was not tested. The precise mechanism
is unclear yet suggests that severe and advanced cases are more magnetically sensitive. Future studies are needed with randomized
placebo-controlled design and longer treatment periods.
Adv Ther. 2000 Mar-Apr;17(2):57-67. LinksSpine fusion for discogenic low back pain: outcomes in patients
treated with or without pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation.Richardson Orthopaedic Surgery, Texas 75080, USA. Sixty-one randomly
selected patients who underwent lumbar fusion surgeries for discogenic low back pain between 1987 and 1994 were retrospectively
studied. All patients had failed to respond to preoperative conservative treatments. Forty-two patients received adjunctive
therapy with pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) stimulation, and 19 patients received no electrical stimulation of any kind.
Average follow-up time was 15.6 months postoperatively. Fusion succeeded in 97.6% of the PEMF group and in 52.6% of the unstimulated
group (P < .001). The observed agreement between clinical and radiographic outcome was 75%. The use of PEMF stimulation
enhances bony bridging in lumbar spinal fusions. Successful fusion underlies a good clinical outcome in patients with discogenic
low back pain.
Therapy with pulsed electromagnetic fields in aseptic
loosening of total hip protheses: a prospective study.Orszagos Reumatologiai es Fizioterapias Intezet, Budapes, Hungary. Aseptic
loosening is the most common problem of hip arthroplasties, limiting its long term success. We report a study of pulsed electromagnetic
field (PEMF) treatment in 24 patients with this complication. At the end of treatment, six months and one year later, pain
and hip movements improved significantly with the exception of flexion and extension. There was significant improvement in
both isotope scans and ultrasonography, but not in plain X-ray. The decreased pain and improved function suggest that PEMF
is effective in improving symptoms of patients with loose hip replacement. No improvement, however, can be expected in patients
with severe pain due to gross loosening.
Eur J Surg Suppl. 1994;(574):83-6. LinksElectrochemical therapy of pelvic pain: effects of pulsed electromagnetic
fields (PEMF) on tissue trauma.International Pain Research Institute, Los Angeles, California. Unusually
effective and long-lasting relief of pelvic pain of gynaecological origin has been obtained consistently by short exposures
of affected areas to the application of a magnetic induction device producing short, sharp, magnetic-field pulses of a minimal
amplitude to initiate the electrochemical phenomenon of electroporation within a 25 cm2 focal area. Treatments are short,
fasting-acting, economical and in many instances have obviated surgery. This report describes typical cases such as dysmenorrhoea,
endometriosis, ruptured ovarian cyst, acute lower urinary tract infection, post-operative haematoma, and persistent dyspareunia
in which pulsed magnetic field treatment has not, in most cases, been supplemented by analgesic medication. Of 17 female patients
presenting with a total of 20 episodes of pelvic pain, of which 11 episodes were acute, seven chronic and two acute as well
as chronic, 16 patients representing 18 episodes (90%) experienced marked, even dramatic relief, while two patients representing
two episodes reported less than complete pain relief.
J Rheumatol. 1993 Mar;20(3):456-60. Links- Comment in:
- J Rheumatol. 1993 Dec;20(12):2166-7.
A double-blind trial of the clinical effects of pulsed electromagnetic fields in osteoarthritis.Department of Medicine (Rheumatology), Danbury Hospital, CT 06810. OBJECTIVE.
Further evaluation of pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF), which have been observed to produce numerous biological effects,
and have been used to treat delayed union fractures for over a decade. METHODS. In a pilot, double-blind randomized trial,
27 patients with osteoarthritis (OA), primarily of the knee, were treated with PEMF. Treatment consisted of 18 half-hour periods
of exposure over about 1 month in a specially designed noncontact, air-coil device. Observations were made on 6 clinical variables
at baseline, midpoint of therapy, end of treatment and one month later; 25 patients completed treatment. RESULTS. An average
improvement of 23-61% occurred in the clinical variables observed with active treatment, while 2 to 18% improvement was observed
in these variables in placebo treated control patients. No toxicity was observed. CONCLUSION. The decreased pain and improved
functional performance of treated patients suggests that this configuration of PEMF has potential as an effective method of
improving symptoms in patients with OA. This method warrants further clinical investigation. PMID: 8478852
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Mil Med. 1993 Feb;158(2):101-4. LinksPulsed, non-thermal, high-frequency electromagnetic energy (DIAPULSE)
in the treatment of grade I and grade II ankle sprains.Orthopedic Surgery Service, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234. Acutely sprained ankles represent a frequent and common injury among active duty troops in training, and
are a significant source of morbidity with respect to days lost to training. Swelling in the form of periarticular edema limits
motion, causes pain, prevents wearing of normal foot gear, and slows the healing process. Reduction of edema was attempted
in acutely sprained ankles by the use of pulsed electromagnetic energy (Diapulse). In a randomized, prospective, double blind
study of 50 grade I and II (no gross instability) sprained ankles, a statistically significant (p < 0.01) decrease in edema
was noted following one treatment with Diapulse. The application of this modality in acutely sprained ankles could result
in significant decreases in time lost to military training.
Br J Dermatol. 1992 Aug;127(2):147-54. LinksA portable pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) device to enhance
healing of recalcitrant venous ulcers: a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University Medical Center, New York. A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre study assessed the clinical efficacy
and safety of pulsed electromagnetic limb ulcer therapy (PELUT) in the healing of recalcitrant, predominantly venous leg ulcers.
The portable device was used at home for 3 h daily during this 8-week clinical trial as an adjunct to a wound dressing. Wound
surface area, ulcer depth and pain intensity were assessed at weeks 0, 4 and 8. At week 8 the active group had a 47.7% decrease
in wound surface area vs. a 42.3% increase for placebo (P < 0.0002). Investigators' global evaluations indicated that 50%
of the ulcers in the active group healed or markedly improved vs. 0% in the placebo group, and 0% of the active group worsened
vs. 54% of the placebo group (P < 0.001). Significant decreases in wound depth (P < 0.04) and pain intensity (P <
0.04) favouring the active group were seen. Patients whose ulcers improved significantly after 8 weeks were permitted to continue
double-blind therapy for an additional 4 weeks. Eleven active and one placebo patient continued therapy until week 12, with
the active treatment group continuing to show improvement. There were no reports of adverse events attributable to this device.
We conclude that the PELUT device is a safe and effective adjunct to non-surgical therapy for recalcitrant venous leg ulcers. PMID: 1390143 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Low energy high frequency pulsed electromagnetic therapy
for acute whiplash injuries. A double blind randomized controlled study.Mater Misericordiae Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. The standard treatment
of acute whiplash injuries (soft collar and analgesia) is frequently unsuccessful. Pulsed electromagnetic therapy PEMT (as
pulsed 27 MHz) has been shown to have pro-healing and anti-inflammatory effects. This study examines the effect of PEMT on
the acute whiplash syndrome. One half of the 40 patients entering the study received active PEMT collars: the other half facsimile
(placebo). All patients were given instructions to wear the collar for eight hours a day at home and advised to mobilise their
necks. At 2 and 4 weeks the actively treated group had significantly improved (p less than 0.05) in terms of pain (visual
analogue scale). By chance movement scores for the PEMT group were significantly worse at entry to the study than the control
group (p less than 0.05). At 12 weeks they had become significantly better (p less than 0.05). PEMT as described is safe for
domiciliary use and this study suggests that PEMT has a beneficial effect in the management of the acute whiplash injury. PMID: 1604262 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE
Lancet. 1984 Mar 31;1(8379):695-8. LinksPulsed electromagnetic field therapy of persistent rotator cuff
tendinitis. A double-blind controlled assessment.The value of pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) for the treatment of persistent rotator cuff
tendinitis was tested in a double-blind controlled study in 29 patients whose symptoms were refractory to steroid injection
and other conventional conservative measures. The treated group (15 patients) had a significant benefit compared with the
control group (14 patients) during the first 4 weeks of the study, when the control group received a placebo. In the second
4 weeks, when all patients were on active coils, no significant differences were noted between the groups. This lack of difference
persisted over the third phase, when neither group received any treatment for 8 weeks. At the end of the study 19 (65%) of
the 29 patients were symptomless and 5 others much improved. PEMF therapy may thus be useful in the treatment of severe and
persistent rotator cuff and possibly other chronic tendon lesions.
Pulsed magnetic field therapy for tibial non-union.
Interim results of a double-blind trial.Patients with tibial fractures which had remained un-united for at least 52 weeks were randomly
allocated to either active or dummy pulsed magnetic field stimulators and treated in full leg plasters for 24 weeks with a
non-weightbearing conservative regimen, as is usual with such techniques. Fractures in 5 of the 9 patients with working machines
united and fractures in 5 of the 7 patients with dummy machines also united. These early results of this double-blind trial
are compatible with a difference in success rate at 24 weeks on active treatment of + 33% to -61% (95% confidence limits)
compared with the success rate on the dummy stimulators. The high proportion of fractures uniting in the control group suggests
that conservative management of non-union is effective and this may explain much of the success attributed to pulsed magnetic
field therapy. PMID: 6143970 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990
May;72(3):347-55. - Comment in:
- J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991 Mar;73(2):352-4.
A double-blind trial of pulsed electromagnetic fields for delayed union of tibial fractures.Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, England. A total of 45 tibial
shaft fractures, all conservatively treated and with union delayed for more than 16 but less than 32 weeks were entered in
a double-blind multi-centre trial. The fractures were selected for their liability to delayed union by the presence of moderate
or severe displacement, angulation or comminution or a compound lesion with moderate or severe injury to skin and soft tissues.
Treatment was by plaster immobilisation in all, with active electromagnetic stimulation units in 20 patients and dummy control
units in 25 patients for 12 weeks. Radiographs were assessed blindly and independently by a radiologist and an orthopaedic
surgeon. Statistical analysis showed the treatment groups to be comparable except in their age distribution, but age was not
found to affect the outcome and the effect of treatment was consistent for each age group. The radiologist's assessment of
the active group showed radiological union in five fractures, progress to union in five but no progress to union in 10. In
the control group there was union in one fracture and progress towards union in one but no progress in 23. Using Fisher's
exact test, the results were very significantly in favour of the active group (p = 0.002). The orthopaedic surgeon's assessment
showed union in nine fractures and absence of union in 11 fractures in the active group. There was union in three fractures
and absence of union in 22 fractures in the control group. These results were also significantly in favour of the active group
(p = 0.02). It was concluded that pulsed electromagnetic fields significantly influence healing in tibial fractures with delayed
union.
Bone density changes in osteoporosis-prone women exposed
to pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMFs).
Tabrah F, Hoffmeier M, Gilbert F Jr, Batkin S, Bassett CA.
University of Hawaii School of Medicine, Straub Clinic and Hospital, Honolulu.
To determine the effect of
a 72 Hz pulsating electromagnetic field (PEMF) on bone density of the radii of osteoporosis-prone women, the nondominant forearms
of 20 subjects were exposed to PEMF 10 h daily for a period of 12 weeks. Bone density before, during, and after the exposure
period was determined by use of a Norland-Cameron bone mineral analyzer. Bone mineral densities of the treated radii measured
by single-photon densitometry increased significantly in the immediate area of the field during the exposure period and decreased
during the following 36 weeks. A similar but weaker response occurred in the opposite arm, suggesting a "cross-talk" effect
on the nontreated radii, from either possible arm proximity during sleep or very weak general field effects. The data suggest
that properly applied PEMFs, if scaled for whole-body use, may have clinical application in the prevention and treatment of
osteoporosis.
PSEUDOARTHROSIS
Am J Orthop. 2004 Jan;33(1):27-30. Pseudarthrosis after lumbar spine fusion: nonoperative salvage with pulsed electromagnetic
fields. Simmons JW Jr, Mooney V, Thacker I. UTMB, Galveston, Texas, USA. We studied 100 patients in whom symptomatic pseudarthrosis
had been established at more than 9 months after lumbar spine fusion. All patients were treated with a pulsed electromagnetic
field device worn consistently 2 hours a day for at least 90 days. Solid fusion was achieved in 67% of patients. Effectiveness
was not statistically significantly different for patients with risk factors such as smoking, use of allograft, absence of
fixation, or multilevel fusions. Treatment was equally effective for posterolateral fusions (66%) as with interbody fusions
(69%). For patients with symptomatic pseudarthrosis after lumbar spine fusion, pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation is
an effective nonoperative salvage approach to achieving fusion.
Study showing the effectiveness of PEMT (pulsed electromagnetic therapy) on lumbar fusions (click to
view) Treatment of delayed unions and nonunions of the proximal fifth
metatarsal with pulsed electromagnetic fields.
Holmes GB Jr.
University Orthopaedics, Rush Medical School, Chicago, Illinois.
Nine delayed unions and nonunion of the proximal
fifth metatarsal were treated with pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF). All fractures healed in a mean time of 4 months (range
2-8 months). Those fractures treated with both pulsed electromagnetic fields and a nonweightbearing cast healed in a mean
time of 3 months (range 2-4 months). The average duration of follow-up was 39 months (range 24-60 months). There were no refractures.
When compared with reported healing times and morbidity for conventional casting, medullary curettage with inlay bone, and
closed axial intramedullary screw fixation, pulsed electromagnetic fields provided an effective alternative for the treatment
of delayed unions and nonunion of the proximal fifth metatarsal.
|